With BIMS recently spotlighting their Anatomage Table and HoloAnatomy software in recruitment materials, we want to open a real discussion about whether these tools provide a measurable academic edge over traditional cadaver-based anatomy programs. Do students at tech-equipped schools actually perform better on shelf exams and Step 1 anatomy sections, or is hands-on cadaver dissection still king? We encourage current students, alumni, and faculty to weigh in with honest, experience-based takes. Keep it civil and constructive.
3 Likes
honestly i think people sleep on how useful the Anatomage actually is. when i was studying for my anatomy practical at a school that only had cadavers, i had to rely on whatever the specimen looked like that day. some of them were in rough shape ngl. being able to rotate a full 3D body, isolate specific layers, and zoom into the brachial plexus without smelling formalin for 3 hours straight sounds like a real win to me. the question is whether BIMS students actually USE it consistently or if it just sits in a lab looking impressive.
1 Like
this is literally my concern too. a lot of schools buy one Anatomage and then it becomes a showpiece in the lobby. if BIMS actually has structured lab time built into the curriculum where professors walk you through cases on it, thats genuinely different. but if its just available and students can optionally go use it, most people are gonna skip it when exams are piling up
1 Like
current BIMS student here. the Anatomage is actually integrated into lab sessions, its not just sitting there. we use it alongside our cadaver work. like we will dissect a region and then go verify on the table what we just found. i think that combo approach is what makes it click. its not replacing the cadaver, its more like a cross-reference. HoloAnatomy we use more for independent review and pre-lab prep